Link to Project Risk Management PrinciplesLink to Elements of Project Risk ManagementLink to When to use Project Risk ManagementLink to Planning a Risk AssessmentLink to Low Risk Project ManagementLink to Home Page      

 

Low Risk Project Management

Project Management Basics

Four phases of a project.

Each Project has Four Phases:

 

  1. Preparing for the Project
  2. Setting up the Project
  3. Implementing the Project
  4. After Project Implementation

 

Remember that we are discussing LOW RISK project management here, not zero risk. By the very nature of project management there will always be uncertainty. These notes are about reducing uncertainty and not about eliminating it.Every project must have a deliverable, a delivery date, a budget, acceptance criteria, and a nominated person to receive it. These five items will enable us to define the objectives of the project and its business case so that the project may begin with some chance of success. In the same, way, each of these phases will have a deliverable, a delivery date, a budget, acceptance criteria and a nominated person.

The project should not be allowed to go from one stage into the next until a formal Risk Assessment has been performed against the deliverables and plans to achieve them. This Risk Assessment would normally be a formal part of the Review and Revise process in between phases. The deliverable from the Risk Assessment would be a data base of risks and the plans to manage each one during the next phase.

 

Preparing for the Project

Preparing for the project is really setting up the deliverables of the project. So the deliverable for the preparation phase is really the production of the items listed below. In setting out the beginning of this phase, delivery date, budget, acceptance criteria and nominated person will need to be agreed before the phase begins.

During this phase we will define the five items listed for the entire project.:

A Deliverable,
Normally this will be the objective of the project i.e. to deliver a new WWW page or a new accounting system, or even a major banking on line system. This definition of what is required will be what the project team will use to prepare their project plans and proposals, so it must be as detailed as possible, and must be something which is either already accepted by the end user community or which can be sold easily to the end user community.

Without this defined objective, the project is bound to sink in chaos sooner or later. It is surprising how many projects cannot produce this statement of what is required. If there is a Statement of User Requirements it has often been drawn up by a technician and the users, when pressed, often do not understand it!

 
A Delivery Date,
The date that the end result of the project is required.
A Budget,
At this time, the best that can be expected is the Business Case for the project. This will include the costs of the project, the benefits to be accrued, and the way in which the product of the project will be measured to ensure that the benefits can be achieved.
Acceptance Criteria, and
A clear and unambiguous statement of how the receivers of the project will be able to agree with the Project Manager that the project is completed.
A Nominated Person to receive it
Normally this person at this stage will be the Project Sponsor, a senior director or manager of the user community, with direct access to the management board, who is in a position to define the requirements and to commit to achieving the savings, as well as to agree the objectives of the project.
 

Setting up the Project

A Deliverable,
This phase of the project should normally expect to have three deliverables:
  1. A detailed Work Breakdown Structure and Project Implementation Plan
  2. A Technical Solution to the Project
  3. Any Contracts and Documents of Understanding which will define people's commitments.

I call this the Project Fire Triangle, because it is analogous to the triangle used by the Fire Services, comprising fuel, oxygen, and temperature. If you remove any one of these the fire will go out, for instance by spraying with an inert gas such as carbon dioxide and thus depriving the fire of oxygen.

In the same way if the three documents are not created to match as one we get this effect:

Naturally, nobody reading these pages is likely to be the kind of project manager who takes no interest in writing a project plan to implement the technical solution, or ensuring that the contracts in place support the project plan.

A Delivery Date,
The date that the three documents described above are to be delivered, and the various resources required to perform the project are either committed or in place.
A Budget,
The budget for this phase, and also a refining of the budget for the total project.
Acceptance Criteria, and
A clear and unambiguous statement of how the receivers of the project will be able to agree with the Project Manager that the three documents described are completed and acceptable, and that the resources required to complete the project are committed.
A Nominated Person to receive it
The Project Sponsor, a senior director or manager of the user community.

Implementing the Project

This is not a treatise on project management, so I don't propose to say much here; after all, the work has been done now, and all that remains is a mechanical process!! Seriously, during the implementation phase all risks must be constantly monitored in accordance with the risk assessments made earlier. It is also vital to manage the contract very tightly as the requirements become changed or clarified. The deliverable from this phase will be the project itself.

After Project Implementation

During this period, while the experience of the project is fresh in peoples' minds, it is helpful to hold a structured but non-threatening review of experience gained. Did the project meet the users' requirements, was it late, did it meet its budget? Where there any lessons learned which we would like other people in the organisation to benefit from? If things went wrong, why did they go wrong, and what can we do better next time? In particular it is important to ensure that the risk assessments are re-visited and that any problems which had not been anticipated are drawn out and understood for the next project!

Project Risk Management Index

Robert Tusler

To discuss the contents of this article, or for advice or information about project risk management, email us.


Robert Tusler is a member of the Alliance of Business Consultants


[RETURN TO TOP]

This Page was created using WebEdit, 4 August 1996
Most recent revision 08 September 1998

Copyright details:

Copyright © 1996 Robert Tusler

You may read these pages on-line, and download them to read later, for your own personal use.
This copyright notice must appear on every page that you print from here.
You must not redistribute these pages or any part of them in any form or medium without first obtaining my consent.
You are welcome to set up links to this website from others - just mail me to tell me if you're doing this please.