www.warrenevans.net

Photograph of Roger Warren Evans

You are in the company of Roger Warren Evans
Subject Index >> My biog >> New Participatory Democracy >> Taming the Corporations >> My Welsh socialism >>
New Socialist Settlement >> Globalise the Left! >> Bevan Re-visited, In Place of Fear >> Psst! Wanna volunteer..?





Earlier
Diary Notes





My publications


My key sources


COPYRIGHT
The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as it source, namely > www.warrenevans.net


 

Diary Note /0046 
Friday 3 May 2002
Did you miss the previous DiaryNote?
Check it out
 


EMERGENCY EDITION
Thursday 9 May 2002

My PC systems have been brought low - NOT (it is thought) by a virus, but by a combination of software glitsches, perhaps combined with system overload. There will be no solution until Sunday 12/5 at the earliest. So - for my promised post-Election thoughts, Check out a special EMERGENCY EDITION . Remember: nothing fancy about this - you will have to use your BACK BUTTON to return to this Page.


Demos (“the people”)
kratos (“strength”) 

“Democracy” has had a good week.  Far from being disappointing, the UK local election results have been most informative, and woe betide the politician who ignores the tales they tell. The French Presidential Election, while entirely different in character, also carries important messages for democratic politics, even before the final votes have been cast. 

But to get to my point.  In both countries, voters have been exhorted to vote for “representatives” to act on their behalf in the discharge of public management responsibilities.  And in both countries they have demonstrated clear disaffection with the systems of public management under which they are called upon to live.  And that is marvellous… Workers do not get the same opportunity to vote on the performance of their management.   We should study the lessons of these results.  

One lesson is that we are approaching the “design limits” of representative democracy itself.  With higher standards of education and understanding, our children may prefer to have some direct participation in the management process themselves.  Top-down systems don’t work well any more, anywhere. 

Don’t get me wrong: my democratic commitment is not waning.  Responsive systems of representative democracy are essential for societal well-being, I do not doubt that.  But they are not sufficient.  The next generation may simply be telling us to move on, to explore new aspects of the strength of the people, i.e. democracy.  Another possibility is that the voters' verdict condemns the design of the governance system itself, not the choice of “representatives” at all.  The principle of democratic management is OK (they may be saying) but the actual management structure is faulty.  These are important challenges, which are not to be ducked. 

My point - finally - is this.   Compulsory voting, still seriously canvassed in some quarters, would have suppressed all this. Many of the most valuable lessons of both these Elections would have been lost.  Compulsory voting is an aberration of democracy, and of democratic reasoning.

  • PS  One successful share-tipster adopts the practice of absorbing all news as it happens, from radio and Internet, and then reading the financial Press one day late - that, he says, has the effect of giving him a 3-D trend effect.  On the same principle, my post-Election analysis will marinate for a few days - more on Wednesday 8 May  Roger WE 

Any thoughts?  Drop me a line > Top  


Nice intervention, shame about the intervener…

I like Hugo Young.  I read everything he writes, in The Guardian.  But this week I bridled at his outright attack on Tony Blair for his “interventionism” abroad [ See The terrifying naivety of Blair the great intervener ].  Because I welcome Blair’s willingness to chance his arm, with ideas about global priorities, future structures.  I praise him for it.  Are national leaders to leave all this to Kofi Annan?  Or Prodi?  Or the World Trade Organisation?  Or Jack Straw?  No. We must all apply our minds to the configuration of global systems.  And that includes Tony Blair.

What worries me about Blair, however, is his own manifest lack of personal judgment.  During the Council Election campaign, daft ideas have come from him thick and fast, as he has developed an attack on dysfunctional families.  His ideas about punishing parents for wayward children are barmy, as was frog-marching vandals to a cash machine, or withdrawing family housing benefit from truanting families.  Sending the Metropolitan Police into the playgrounds of London is another misjudgment, mirroring errors made in New York.  He shows himself up as an adept populist politician but lacking balanced judgment.  He is quick-thinking and eloquent, but also intolerant and illiberal.  

This combination, it must be admitted, can be an asset.  The speed of thought and word are both political advantages - and millions of his fellow citizens are just as intolerant and illiberal as he is, therefore sympathetic.  But I find the absence of any personal liberal instinct deeply worrying.  I do not ask for a PM who is all Sixties’, Woodstock, long hair and sandals, nor for the return of his acoustic guitar.  But it would be marvellous if he could show himself on occasion to be a bit more liberal, more humane.  In short, it is not “interventionism” as such which worries me, but the particular manner of Blair’s own interventions.  Cherie Blair may be a human rights lawyer, but none of it has rubbed off on Tony. 

Shorn of that tempering liberality, I worry about Tony.  Without a sense that there are limits beyond which Government actions should not go – how would Blair react under fire, say, if Saddam Hussein struck back?  Where will his judgment eventually take him on drugs-law reform, on youth crime, on immigration?   Does he have any limits, any no go areas?  I cannot answer that question.  But I do worry about it – don’t you?
Well, don't you?
Drop me a line > Top  


Short Cuts

Lack of judgment also, sadly, afflicts Clare Short.  “Never allege fraud unless you can prove it” – that’s what my dear Pupilmaster Derek Hyamson taught me, when I was pupilled at 11 Kings Bench Walk (me and Derry Irvine, that was…)  Pupillage at the Bar was a time of great learning, and was combined with the thrills of early Court appearance.  In those days, Pupil Barristers got to pick up their own Briefs (no longer permitted, I understand, by way of public protection) and learning curves were very steep.  But the perils of “alleging fraud” were drummed into me, again and again. 

Clare Short ill-advisedly alleged fraud this week, in the pursuit of her obsession with the Tanzanian Air Traffic Control Project.  

  • “I find it very difficult to believe that this contract could have been made cleanly, although I have no information to that effect”. 

That was unforgivable.  She was speaking to a Conference on corruption and arms sales, so there was no room of any “misunderstanding”.  Her words offended every principle of fair play and good judgment.  For all her qualities, Clare Short is a loose cannon, fiery and intemperate.  Her outburst - “They’ll want golden elephants next- has scarcely been forgotten, and she comes out with this unfounded slur upon a sovereign African Government.  If I were Tony Blair, I would get rid of her.  She could yet do more harm than good.
Your thoughts
?  Drop me a line > Top  


Nuclear Options

My espousal of civil nuclear power [ Diary Note 0045 ] drew an immediate riposte from Exeter, from Colin Farlow.  Colin is a professional policy researcher, formerly with Cleveland.  Like me, he is a devotee of the city region as the right primary unit for the UK Constitution.  The City Region Campaign held its AGM in London this week, and continues to box its corner.  But Colin does have strong views about nuclear power...        

[ make sure you read him, at Colin Farlow ]


Ochlocracy Rules OK

Don't worry - I didn’t know the word either. I had to look it up.  A C Grayling used it this week in a think-piece in The Guardian about democracy [ The Last Word on Democracy ]  He explored all those past authors and philosophers for whom democracy was a dirty word, a form of abasement before the untutored mob.  

My Chambers Dictionary tells me that ochlocracy simply means “mob-rule”, 1789 an’ all that. Grayling’s essay emphasises, however, the preoccupation with representative democracy that characterises western societies, as if all that mattered was the process whereby an elite came to be selected – whether aristocracy, oligarchy, plutocracy, or dictatorship.  My view is that representative democracy is no longer enough.  If we are to deal with present discontents, we must start work on improving the quality of participatory democracy [ you’ll find some of my  suggestions at New Participatory Democracy]
Your thoughts Drop me a line > Top   

Weight-loss Report

Just to keep in touch - my weight-loss progress is now slow - and it is NOT (let me report, by way of advice to other fatties) a matter of exercise - this is simply a matter of reducing intake, simple starvation -  I don't have time for exercise - this is what the record-books say, since the date of my New Year Resolution -

19 st 6 lbs (1st January)
18st 5 lbs (1st February)
17 st 12lbs (1st March)
17 st 7 lbs (1st April)
17 st 2 lbs (1st May)
  

Le Pen, Le Crunch

Le Pen’s success has focused political minds.  French politics are our own.  A global system of migration management must now be high upon the international political agenda.   

My proposal is that we focus on three Organising Principles which could form the foundation of a future international settlement.  They go to the three issues of quantum, domicile, and asylum [ see my prescription at QUADAS ].  I envisage an international round of protracted negotiation, with all Members of the United Nations taking part (just like the Uruguay Round or the new Doha Round, for trade and global business).

It is pointless for the EU simply to agree a common Fortress Europe policy, as they are currently seeking to do.  The UN process might well take six, seven years – my own target for final agreement is 2010.  But let’s make a start, shall we?  And deliver a positive, constructive response to the challenge of Le Pen?  Read QUADAS.

After QUADAS Drop me a line > Top  


Vivendi Enlivened

What a hoot!   At Vivendi, the French electronics giant, the Management
this week went too far, and tried to steal too much money from the shareholders!  At the key AGM (in Paris, on 24 April) everyone was lined up to vote by electronic handset – and the Good Guys hacked their way into the handset code - and blocked 20% of the votes cast in support!  The screen showed a 20% abstention rate, when nobody admitted to abstaining at all.  The vote was lost, the Good Guys won. The Baddie Management was defeated.  It was all in the best French syndicaliste tradition, with the good-guys hi-jacking the voting-factory.  But the Management crooks are fighting back, and plan to re-run the vote – watch this space.  

Have you ever been a disgruntled shareholder?

Let us know - Drop me a line > Top  


Welsh Pride

In Welsh, the prefix "ap" simply means "son of".  Ap Robert has, over the years, become Probert.   Ap Evan has become Bevan.  Ap Rhys has become Price.  Ap Richard becomes Pritchard. And Ap Maryk became Amerik, because the “p” sound can mutate to “m”, in the arcane world of Welsh mutations.  None of this would matter, if it were not for John Cabot (who discovered America in 1496, four years before Florentine Amerigo Vespucci), and for the efforts of Rodney Groome, who has just published a new theory [ “Amerike, the Briton who gave America its name” ] 

Because Groome argues that the Bristol-based John Cabot, stumbling accidentally upon new lands in 1496, dubbed them Amerike, after his wealthy backer Thomas Amerike (or Ameryk), a Welshman holding the office of Kings Customs Officer and living in Bristol, in Clifton Manor.  “How come, a Welshman in Bristol?” (I hear you cry..) Thomas Ameryk moved into Bristol when Welshman Henry VII came to the throne at the end of the Wars of the Roses (which, as I know you will  remember) was 1485.  Thomas Ameryk was appointed the Bristol Customs Officer by the new King in 1486.

Wotta story!  That should be worth a few votes for Plaid Cymru, in the May 2003 Assembly Elections.  Welshman Henry VII who, like Saddam Hussein, liked to have close friends or relatives in key positions – brought in Thomas Ameryk as his Tax Collector for Bristol…   NB  Welsh-speaking John Marek is still the Assembly Member for Wrexham, and Deputy Speaker of the Welsh Assemblyany relation?  

Comment? Drop me a line > Top  


Not The
Human Rights Act
 

Perspective  is sometimes lacking, in the human rights debate.  While the Human Rights Act 1998 is important, it does not cover everything. And at the moment there is a temptation to overplay the human rights card.

This is the week that the Strasbourg Human Rights Commission refused to accept Diane Pretty’s argument that she was entitled to ask her husband to end her life, in a form of assisted euthanasia.  The Strasbourg judges held unanimously that the “right to life” did not extend to an “right to have that life terminated”, however dire the circumstances.  I had originally backed the action of LIBERTY, in taking up her case.  But I came to realise, in the course of the proceedings, that the reasoning was defective.  It is one thing for a person of sound mind to refuse medication, and thus hasten death – there was also a case of that, this week.  But it was quite another, as the Strasbourg Judges reasoned, to invite another person to terminate ones own life.  That brought into play a quite different range of considerations. The right to live did not include a right to die. 

On the same day, the Tory Shadow Cabinet decided to support tobacco advertising (rather, to oppose the Government’s introduction of bans on advertising).  This position was based, the report ran, on the grounds that the restriction upon individual freedom was too high a price to pay.  The Shadow Cabinet is showing increasing interest in taking up the libertarian cudgels, under Oliver Letwin.  But what freedom is engaged here?  And whose?  Do they mean the “freedom of speech” of the tobacco companies?  That cannot be, for freedom of speech cannot be enjoyed by artificial persons at all, only by natural persons like you and me.  Do they mean the individual’s freedom-to-consume?  If so, I agree with them.  I think that tobacco smokers are a grievously oppressed group, who deserve to be treated with far greater liberality, consideration and support.  But the freedom-to-consume is not infringed by an advertising ban.  I favour such bans, both for tobacco and for alcohol.

No good cause is served by trying to push human rights reasoning too far.  Such excesses detract from a mighty cause whose international time has yet to come.  When I get around to writing up my universal Power Pack Theory, human rights will loom large as a crucial organising principle in the future development of socialism.  More to follow.


In honour of Figes

Kate Figes speaks for the young.   I have already placed an order for her £9.99 book Terrible Teens, to be published on 13 June by Viking.

Her thesis, developed in The Guardian [ No Guardian Angels  27 April ] is that our teenagers are merely behaving as we are conditioning them to behave.  We condemn them to live in communities where drugs prohibition has generated high levels of crime.  We blame them for forming destructive gangs, but we have allowed the Youth Service to collapse, unfunded for the last twenty years.  There are 60,000 children waiting to join the Scouts, but no adults to staff new groups.  We condemn school violence, but school education is frequently unstimulating and unproductive.  And in the UK we treat teenagers as having full criminal liability for their actions, while manifestly immature.  That is a profoundly uncivilised practice. 

  • “All adults, not just parents, need to reach out to the young and to welcome them into their world with guidance, public rites of passage, understanding and love.  How are the young ever to learn responsibility and respect towards others, unless adults teach them by example” 

Kate Figes sounds like my kinda woman.  I would go further than her - because I would withdraw all compulsion from education  from age-13 onwards.  If we use violence against children – truancy sweeps, Police Officers in playgrounds, parental loss of benefit and other barmy and illiberal ideas – our children will repay us with violence, as we deserve to be repaid.  Vote Kate Figes!

Any thoughts?  Drop me a line

> Top  

Back to today's Home Page  

 


Did you miss the previous DiaryNote? 
Check it out

 


You are in the company of Roger Warren Evans