www.warrenevans.net |
|
You are in the company of Roger Warren Evans
Subject
Index >> My
biog >> New
Participatory Democracy >>
Taming the Corporations >> My
Welsh socialism >>
New
Socialist Settlement >>
Globalise
the Left! >>
Bevan Re-visited, In Place of Fear >>
Psst!
Wanna volunteer..?
|
My publications My key sources COPYRIGHT The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as it source, namely > www.warrenevans.net |
E-Mail from Colin Farlow of Exeter Roger,
First: Your site is a superb bundle of energy and useful
provocation. How many people are under your hat! I will certainly
forward the url to others who will be interested.
Nuclear power: Sorry, can't agree.
It is expensive and hazardous.
It necessarily requires exactly the wrong strain of politics to safeguard
it. It is not the solution to cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
When working for South Yorks County Council in the late
70s and early 80s, I was heavily involved in their opposition to nuclear
power, especially through the Sizewell B Inquiry. Oddly enough, when
I joined South Yorks County Council, I was pro-nuclear. I recall sneering at friends
who opposed Torness.
My first briefing for the then Leader, when he addressed a new group set up by the NUM, was (bizarrely) pro-nuclear. But I then read quite deeply into the topic, became involved in the production of some proofs of evidence submitted to the Inquiry, and changed my mind.
Of course, South Yorks CC position was squarely pro-coal.
I admit I always felt ambivalent about that - though the wholesale massacre
of that industry was indefensible. It brought intense problems that
will be familiar to you in South Wales.
I do not think it is utopian to point to the
developments in solar power. Solar panels can make every roof into a
potential power generator. I am pleased to see that the Government
(for which I have much less time than you) has allocated money to
subsidise their installation, and the costs are tumbling anyway.
Within a few years, a massive proportion of the load now generated in
stations could be replaced.
Yes, I know that still leaves the problem of night-time
baseload, but that is a more manageable problem than the whole load.
Best wishes,
Colin Farlow
| ||