Drugs: a cruel deceit
The turn of the year is upon us. And Government drugs policy is definitely turning.
The Lambeth policing experiment (avoiding arrests for cannabis, using confiscation
and “warnings” instead) was due to end on 31 December, but will be extended for another
couple of months, pending a further Police Foundation report: see Nick Hopkins,
writing in The Guardian.
Educative drugs publicity is being stepped-up, through all the media: see Alan Travis,
also in
The Guardian.
Consideration is being given to heroin prescription, reverting to pre-1971 medical practice.
This is all good news.
Yet it is also a cruel deception. No law will be changed. None of these changes
will remove the awful stain of criminality from drug-users. That stain will remain,
in spite of changes in Police and Home Office practice – young lives will still be
blighted, careers ruined, relationships destroyed, families broken. A professional
career can be destroyed for criminality, without a prosecution. And the home-growing
of cannabis will still be prosecuted, trapping the poorer and unwary user. The
criminal fraternity will still thrive. International drug-trafficking will still
prosper. As a matter of law, nothing will change.
Indeed, the deceit will go further. Citizens will be faced with a range of activities
designated by Parliament as “crimes”, while expecting the Police to take no action
when the activity | is undertaken. This leaves local Police with awesome
discretionary powers, to prosecute or not to prosecute: such a discretion will be
the breeding-ground of corruption. And while the Metropolitan Police, working in
a cosmopolitan London, may well take a liberal line, provincial Police forces can
be far less forgiving. There will be no enforceable Government instruction, binding
them not to prosecute: in our Constitution, such intervention would be unlawful.
The result will be “postcode justice”, unpredictable and perverse.
The only solution is to sweep away the paraphernalia of prohibition, which Europe
imported from America in 1920. The stain of criminality must be removed forever
from drug-users, as it has from users of alcohol and tobacco.
For me, this is a fundamental civil rights issue. I am playing my part, in promoting
the case for radical reform. In Autumn 1999, I made my first move and published a
pamphlet Drugs: The Defining Liberal Issue.
LIBERTY, the leading civil rights group of which I am a member and Director, is committed
to the legalisation of the consumption and supply of all psychoactive substances. I was
the draftsman of the “Angel Declaration” in September 2001, and I remain
Secretary of Angel Action the group promoting the Declaration. We are
seeking to assemble the voices for reform, as public signatories to the Declaration.
If you want to add your signature, you can sign on-line at the
Angel Declaration
Back to Diary Archive
|